Replies: 17
| visibility 5
|
Orange Blooded [4142]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4397
Joined: 10/22/14
|
I only want to point out one issue with refs Sat.
Nov 9, 2020, 11:57 AM
|
|
There was a lot we could question for both teams, and pretty much every Tiger near a sideline WAS hit out of bounds, but what evs. My issue is this, Powell's non-TD vs Book's. If you watched the replay, Powell had at LEAST the nose of the football in the endzone before his buttock or whatever they claimed hit. Ok, Cinco punched it in..no harm. But then Book has a VERY similar play, and the ball was actually farther behind the line...TD. GTHOH! OK, Is that why we lost? Absolutely not. But it just goes to show how bad replays are in my opinion. Even the ones that they review twice which still boggles my brain. Go Tigers!
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21609]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13928
Joined: 9/7/02
|
The worst call was the deep ball where the ball hit the
Nov 9, 2020, 11:59 AM
|
|
ground....it was clear as day.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [32847]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14954
Joined: 6/29/11
|
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ this ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
Nov 9, 2020, 12:00 PM
|
|
Probably the worst upheld review I have EVER seen.
We still should have won - no excuses - get healed up - CRUSH the semiholes.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [20308]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16843
Joined: 11/28/00
|
Re: The worst call was the deep ball where the ball hit the
Nov 9, 2020, 12:05 PM
[ in reply to The worst call was the deep ball where the ball hit the ] |
|
TOTALLY CLEAR!!! Even the announcers AND the Officiating adviser said "it was indisputable" that the ball moved after making contact with the ground and therefore was an INCOMPLETE PASS!
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
Also, all three of them said the clock should have started
Nov 9, 2020, 12:14 PM
|
|
running when ND declined the holding penalty on our final possession.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64872]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 89149
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Yes...it should have.***
Nov 9, 2020, 12:17 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64872]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 89149
Joined: 3/27/01
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4142]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4397
Joined: 10/22/14
|
Re: I only want to point out one issue with refs Sat.
Nov 9, 2020, 12:06 PM
|
|
I definitely agree with that. No control, didnt maintain. Not saying there was a talk ahead of the game, but best believe bosses in ACC were hoping for exactly what happened, a close Tigers loss.
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [50]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 95
Joined: 10/30/19
|
Re: I only want to point out one issue with refs Sat.
Nov 9, 2020, 12:10 PM
|
|
The one thing i didn't like was the overabundance of reviews and confusion by the refs. Constant stoppage and even an overturn of a review decision. huh? First time I've seen that
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [105574]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 44178
Joined: 12/22/08
|
What about the defensive "touchdown" Notre Dame
Nov 9, 2020, 12:15 PM
|
|
had when he was down well before the goal line?
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2947]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3344
Joined: 6/20/00
|
They said his shin was down because he turned his ankle
Nov 9, 2020, 12:19 PM
|
|
up when he fell towards the goalline. They didn't make moves like that in The Matrix.
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [541]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 786
Joined: 11/13/16
|
Re: I only want to point out one issue with refs Sat.
Nov 9, 2020, 1:23 PM
|
|
This may or may not fit into the same category as all the others mentioned here.....and I DEFINITELY don't want to go all OSU on here - we should have made the plays to win the game. But what about the defensive offsides late in the game. That has always been a free offensive play - to which would have been a TD or big play, minimum...but they stopped the play and brought it back. Only gave us 5-yd for penalty. Why?? They didn't appear to be unabated to the QB - why stop it?
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64872]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 89149
Joined: 3/27/01
|
I believe the defender made contact with the OL...
Nov 9, 2020, 1:33 PM
|
|
which is why they stopped the play.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18089]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9009
Joined: 12/24/96
|
Did you see the holding on our DB by their receiver>
Nov 9, 2020, 1:56 PM
|
|
OMG was that blatant. ND guy ran right by him in the video replay - they only showed that one once. Did I say it was blatant? OMG!
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64872]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 89149
Joined: 3/27/01
|
The Notre Dame OL was holding all night...
Nov 9, 2020, 3:49 PM
|
|
the officials called it once.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1728]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1302
Joined: 9/3/07
|
Re: The Notre Dame OL was holding all night...
Nov 9, 2020, 4:26 PM
|
|
Cmon guys. The absolute worst thing was the stoppage to review the previous review. I have never saw that. And ole boatdrinks has seen a lot. Let me tell you
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64872]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 89149
Joined: 3/27/01
|
The re-review of the review was definitely a first for me***
Nov 9, 2020, 4:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [503]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 190
Joined: 11/14/14
|
Re: I only want to point out one issue with refs Sat.
Nov 9, 2020, 9:32 PM
|
|
I was a little aggravated when the ref threw the flag in OT for the "late" hit out of bounds. This ref clearly could see the flag already thrown for ND holding.
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 5
|
|
|