Replies: 19
| visibility 1
|
Orange Blooded [2180]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2690
Joined: 8/2/06
|
SpurSack just drew up a game plan for the CU game...
Sep 24, 2012, 2:55 PM
|
|
Play #1 - Hand off to 21 Play #2 - QB keeper Shaw runs wild Play #3 - Wildcat with B. Ellington Repeat and rush for 800 yds.
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22503]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 31361
Joined: 11/30/98
|
You may want to change #2.
Sep 24, 2012, 3:01 PM
|
|
I don't expect Conner Shaw to be available for our game.
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [727]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 964
Joined: 10/13/08
|
He better draw up a defensive plan we just put up 438 yards.
Sep 24, 2012, 3:07 PM
|
|
and 37 points against FSU @ FSU On an ESecPN Gameday @ night. Sakerlina's front 4 are as good as FSU's, but not two deep. FSU has better LBs and DBs
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [176]
TigerPulse: 27%
Posts: 279
Joined: 12/7/98
|
Re: He better draw up a defensive plan we just put up 438 yards.
Sep 24, 2012, 3:20 PM
|
|
Last year against FSU you had 443 yards and scored 35 points. Against South Carolina you had 153 total yards and 13 points.
It is fun for Clemson fans to pretend that FSU has the world's greatest defense, but there is no evidence to actually back up that claim.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23122]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19822
Joined: 1/15/11
|
No pretending, ESPN said FSU had the best D this year.
Sep 24, 2012, 3:25 PM
|
|
It was the #### fans that tried to make Vandy into world beaters, not the other way around. ESecPN has said the best D in college football 2012 is FSU. Last year has nothing to do with it.
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [727]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 964
Joined: 10/13/08
|
Ask Marcus Lattimore is FSU can hit hard. Oh yeah he won't
Sep 24, 2012, 3:51 PM
|
|
remember because he was knocked the #### out.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2564]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4862
Joined: 10/2/08
|
Lets all hope FSU loses a couple and maybe SCjr can get
Sep 24, 2012, 3:25 PM
[ in reply to Re: He better draw up a defensive plan we just put up 438 yards. ] |
|
that rematch of the Chic Fil A bowl.
Remember that one ? Where the heisman running back got 8itch slapped and left the game.
Or ask Fla about FSU....its been 2009 since they've won.
Seems like they backed up those claims...
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 14500
Joined: 1/2/11
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Boy you coots love last year***
Sep 24, 2012, 4:08 PM
|
|
Better than loving 30 years ago!
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2180]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2690
Joined: 8/2/06
|
Re: Boy you coots love last year***
Sep 24, 2012, 4:46 PM
|
|
Why are you here? Just another coot obsessed with reading our boards.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9986
Joined: 6/12/10
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2564]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4862
Joined: 10/2/08
|
Yards and points and who did what...here's your target...
Sep 24, 2012, 3:41 PM
[ in reply to Re: He better draw up a defensive plan we just put up 438 yards. ] |
|
63-17
Outdo that... Cause we set the bar pretty high...at your nasty a$$ stadium.
So , there's your target...bring it. Cause we will be looking to hang 63 on ya'll again.
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [727]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 964
Joined: 10/13/08
|
Re: He better draw up a defensive plan we just put up 438 yards.
Sep 24, 2012, 3:47 PM
[ in reply to Re: He better draw up a defensive plan we just put up 438 yards. ] |
|
FSU's defense is better and deeper this years. Scar's defense isn't as good w/ the exception of the front 4. Our offense is playing light years better this season and it's a Death Valley. If it was at Willie B, I'd be concerned. I might change mu opinion about Scar when then play someone, which they will octber6-20. So far it's been teams w/ a combined 5-10 record. Play down our Auburn victory, but they just took LSU to the wire, and it's something that SCar hasn't done since joining the SEC, or since 1933 for that matter
|
|
|
|
|
Commissioner [973]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 1573
Joined: 6/4/12
|
Well to the bright coot...
Sep 24, 2012, 3:36 PM
|
|
With remarks concerning last season. You do realize nc state beat us worse than scar, last year? Why is that? Injuries on the line and youth on the road. You think you could've beat a healthy Clemson early in the season? Not likely when you lost to auburn again at home. The valley will be very inviting for you come November.
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [727]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 964
Joined: 10/13/08
|
Re: Well to the bright coot...
Sep 24, 2012, 3:53 PM
|
|
i wonder if he can add well enough to deduct that 63-17 is a worse ### beating mathematically than 70-33. That still pisses me off w/ Tommy Bowden, he only did running plays for the last quarter and a half. We could've scored 100. Dana the forehead kept the pedal to the metal til the clock sounded
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [25234]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 32439
Joined: 2/15/09
|
56-17 loss to Auburn in a BIG game
Sep 24, 2012, 4:50 PM
|
|
is also more points than 70-33
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 14500
Joined: 1/2/11
|
Too bad Shaw won't be there, his shoulder isn't lasting
Sep 24, 2012, 3:37 PM
|
|
through that stretch. He is playing sister of the poor right now and getting drilled
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [54]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Too bad Shaw won't be there, his shoulder isn't lasting
Sep 24, 2012, 4:04 PM
|
|
I kinda hope Shaw will still be there, I think that Thompson fella they got will destroy our pitiful secondary....but even shaw could probably come in with his arm in a swing and run all over our defensive front-- unless they find a way to put the Garcia fella out there in November, we're gonna take a tail whippin from the ##### come november.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9986
Joined: 6/12/10
|
Re: Too bad Shaw won't be there, his shoulder isn't lasting
Sep 24, 2012, 4:58 PM
|
|
better be a high swing. the coots will lose to us in november at the valley to cap our 2nd undefeated home season in a row!
|
|
|
|
Replies: 19
| visibility 1
|
|
|