Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Quick downtime discussion. We give Dabo a lot of credit
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 8
| visibility 660

Quick downtime discussion. We give Dabo a lot of credit


Nov 30, 2012, 2:39 PM

and rightfully so. However, do you think our ability to have back-to-back 10-win seasons is a tribute to Dabo and his staff and the ability they have to turn this around?...or...Is our back-to-back 10-win seasons just a microcosm of how bad the ACC really is now compared to Bowden's tenure when he stalled at 9 wins on three occasions? Thoughts on both. Be interested to see the repsonses to try and figure whether we are the same team in a watered down conference or if we are truly turning the corner.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Watch the team on the field.


Nov 30, 2012, 2:41 PM

The eye test tells you that we are improving.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Watch the team on the field.


Nov 30, 2012, 2:45 PM

The eye test still tells me we still out-athlete other teams, just like we did under Bowden.

There were several games this year where we struggled to average 3.5 yards per carry against some pretty bad competition, indicating a lack of either 1) strength 2) physicality or 3) motivation along the offensive line.

The eye test also tells me that our defense isn't nearly as good as it used to be (with the exception of 2010)

We can basically outrun people. Nothing I've seen indicates that we would be able to consistently compete against top teams.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Watch the team on the field.


Nov 30, 2012, 3:02 PM

All good pts. I would point out, I myself, cant recall a dominant team being made up of sophomores and freshman. This I feel bodes well for the next two yrs and beyond.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Quick downtime discussion. We give Dabo a lot of credit


Nov 30, 2012, 2:41 PM

Dabo is an upper-mid level coach. The down ACC is definitely part since he can't seem to beat the highly ranked teams. But Morris and the offense certainly are upper level bordering on elite at times.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Little of both, but we've never had a combo like


Nov 30, 2012, 2:46 PM

Nuk, Sammy, and Boyd here. If Bowden had these guys, he'd still be coaching.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Some of both


Nov 30, 2012, 2:50 PM

The ACC is down no doubt, but the difference is that we appear to have purged the tendency to play down to the level of our competition.

10 regular season wins, regardless of the competition, confirms one thing - consistency. Consistency was what the Bowden teams lacked most. There will always be swings from game to game - even the best teams don't play their best every week - however, one of the goals for every team is to minimize the difference between the best and weakest performances. I think we're doing that, and we should expect to see the same kind of consistency next year, along with overall improvement.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Bowden barely beat or got beat by teams we should crush


Nov 30, 2012, 2:53 PM

Dabo and crew demolish the teams we should beat. Now we just need to get to the point where we should be beating everyone on our schedule. Frankly, I think if we could improve both the O and D line we'd be there. We led a decent amount of the game against FSU and we were in the USuc game a lot more than the score shows.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

In all but a few cases, most every team drops


Nov 30, 2012, 2:57 PM

a game it should have won (on paper) or could have won (minus some mistakes). Oregon, KSU, Alabama, FSU, Georgia - all of them are very good teams, and all of them had head scratching losses.

The goal at every program is to create the most complete team possible, and then compete at the highest level possible week-in and week-out. And it is an incredibly difficult task, even at an elite program. At 10-2, even with our disappointing losses, I think we're in good shape for the future.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 8
| visibility 660
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic