Replies: 18
| visibility 1
|
All-In [26635]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 20731
Joined: 9/2/02
|
Baseball is the perfect sport to computerize officiating 100
Mar 1, 2018, 3:17 PM
|
|
percent and do away with the inherent bias of human umpiring.
MLB already has the strike zone up on the screen ... have a computer call balls and strikes.
Baselines have light sensors ... bases have touch sensors.
Easy peasy.
Besides golf, that would make it the purist sport around.
|
|
|
|
Legend [16384]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9556
Joined: 2/21/06
|
Re: Baseball is the perfect sport to computerize officiating 100
Mar 1, 2018, 3:32 PM
|
|
Agreed, but then what's the point of me working on my heckle skills i.e. "C'MON BLUUUUE" and "We wanna pitcher, not a belly itcher"?
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58632]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46415
Joined: 4/23/00
|
What is the reasoning for NOT having an automated
Mar 1, 2018, 3:33 PM
|
|
strike zone where balls and strikes are called by computer?
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4610]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3371
Joined: 8/14/01
|
Re: What is the reasoning for NOT having an automated
Mar 1, 2018, 3:40 PM
|
|
Umpires union?
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58632]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46415
Joined: 4/23/00
|
There would still be a need for behind the plate umps.***
Mar 1, 2018, 3:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [-100]
TigerPulse: 53%
Posts: 268
Joined: 9/24/01
|
Re: What is the reasoning for NOT having an automated
Mar 1, 2018, 3:45 PM
[ in reply to What is the reasoning for NOT having an automated ] |
|
Might as well play video game. Taking too much human element out of game. Might as well have robots for players
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58632]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46415
Joined: 4/23/00
|
That's simply not true, and a pretty lame argument.
Mar 1, 2018, 4:01 PM
|
|
The only human element you're taking out is a human's ability to make critical mistakes that wrongly and unfairly affect the outcome. You'd still have humans vs. humans, with plenty of mistakes being made which reflect the ability and effort of the players, as it should be.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5977]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6620
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Not no, but he???? no!!!!!! How can
Mar 1, 2018, 3:48 PM
|
|
A coach go out on the field an argue with a computer? Sports are played by humans who make mistakes, so do officials it’s part of the game. Relay in football is awful, so what if the officials miss a call or two it’s a game.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64693]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 89031
Joined: 3/27/01
|
^^^ future head of ACC officiating ^^^***
Mar 1, 2018, 4:02 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1760]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1677
Joined: 12/8/98
|
Re: Baseball is the perfect sport to computerize officiating 100
Mar 1, 2018, 3:52 PM
|
|
Baseball already has large stretches of no action... if you also take out the uncertainty of getting calls right baseball will be BORING! Let's get rid of the replay / review just to speed the game back up while we're at it.
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [97078]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 29240
Joined: 9/14/05
|
You would still need umps for things like
Mar 1, 2018, 3:54 PM
|
|
judging whether a runner was tagged out, balks, pitcher intentionally trying to hit the batter, etc.
But yes, the balls and strikes could be automated.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4610]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3371
Joined: 8/14/01
|
Re: Baseball is the perfect sport to computerize officiating 100
Mar 1, 2018, 4:19 PM
|
|
How about "did the runner beat the throw?" Or "was the tag before the base or after?" Or even " did he actually tag the runner?" Sensors in glove or what?
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [337]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 469
Joined: 1/6/02
|
RUSSIAN HACKING***
Mar 1, 2018, 4:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16336]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12804
Joined: 11/14/09
|
What makes baseball perfect is its beautiful imperfections.
Mar 1, 2018, 4:37 PM
|
|
The human element in the umpiring is part of the game. Not always the greatest, but blown calls tend to go both ways. I'd hate to see that go.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58632]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46415
Joined: 4/23/00
|
I couldn't disagree more, and can't understand that line
Mar 1, 2018, 4:46 PM
|
|
of thinking at all. Preventable mistakes that very unfairly alter the outcomes of games are somehow a good thing? If so, why not try to have more of them? Don't Umps work hard NOT to make mistakes?
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16336]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12804
Joined: 11/14/09
|
Because it's a human game with humans calling it.
Mar 1, 2018, 5:52 PM
|
|
An Error is an actual stat - a primary one with runs and hits. Umps, and their errors, are part of the game also. Now, if we're talking ACC basketball, I'm all for robot refs. I just don't think baseball needs to go there. Different game played a different way.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18407]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10717
Joined: 10/20/13
|
Re: Baseball is the perfect sport to computerize officiating 100
Mar 1, 2018, 5:43 PM
|
|
How would you judge whether or not a batter swings.
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [18407]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10717
Joined: 10/20/13
|
Re: Baseball is the perfect sport to computerize officiating 100
Mar 1, 2018, 5:45 PM
|
|
How would you tell if the batter went around or not ?
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 26233
Joined: 9/19/11
|
Las Vegas ain't gonna be too happy with your suggestion.***
Mar 1, 2018, 9:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 18
| visibility 1
|
|
|