|
Replies: 22
| visibility 1
|
Athletic Dir [865]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 987
Joined: 11/27/15
|
ACC Bowl game predictions
Dec 26, 2016, 9:24 AM
|
|
I think we have an outside chance to run the table but realistically I think we win 70%
VT v Arkansas- W
MD v BC-W
Vandy v NC State-W
Pitt v NW-W
WVU v Miami-L
Wake v Temple-L
LSU v Lou-L
Mich v FSU-W
GT v Kentucky-W
Clemson v Lil Bucky -W
What say you?
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1654]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 3509
Joined: 11/18/01
|
BC ain't beating anybody***
Dec 26, 2016, 9:37 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1186]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1298
Joined: 1/4/04
|
Re: BC ain't beating anybody***
Dec 26, 2016, 9:38 AM
|
|
Haha this game might be BC - 3, Maryland - 0. Ughggh
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1654]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 3509
Joined: 11/18/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [865]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 987
Joined: 11/27/15
|
Re: I stand corrected***
Dec 26, 2016, 7:26 PM
|
|
We are about to move to 2-0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [107]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12
Joined: 9/28/16
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [54026]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8819
Joined: 12/26/15
|
While I am strong on the ACC
Dec 26, 2016, 9:38 AM
|
|
there ain't but one bowl game that matters............GO TIGERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6281]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12983
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: ACC Bowl game predictions
Dec 26, 2016, 9:50 AM
|
|
I think Wake and Miami both win for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40141]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18293
Joined: 10/28/15
|
Not exactly doubting you on this but sort of.
Dec 26, 2016, 10:01 AM
|
|
Does your opinion include the fact that 7 of miamis players stay home?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6281]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12983
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: Not exactly doubting you on this but sort of.
Dec 26, 2016, 10:11 AM
|
|
Yes idc who they bring WVU is overrated IMO. Miami has better athletes. I know that does not always translate to wins though. I worry about VT, GT, and BC. I think every other team wins for sure. Though it is college football with weeks to prep you just never know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40141]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18293
Joined: 10/28/15
|
OK. Nice argument. You are right that only one was a
Dec 26, 2016, 11:49 AM
|
|
difference maker. As to your comment on their athletes, exactly why your "bluebloods" like USC, FSU, Miami etc. can be in almost any game and are dangerous. They have the athletes to beat anyone on a given day if they get it together. At that point, it comes down to discipline and coaching. I agree the Big 12 sux and WVU was one of the cream of their conference this year. I actually predict WVU wins. But, it's college football and anything can happen. You may be right. I don't bet on games anyways, but this one I certainly wouldn't put any money on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6281]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12983
Joined: 4/21/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athletic Dir [865]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 987
Joined: 11/27/15
|
Re: Not exactly doubting you on this but sort of.
Dec 26, 2016, 10:28 AM
[ in reply to Not exactly doubting you on this but sort of. ] |
|
> Does your opinion include the fact that 7 of miamis
> players stay home?
It does I know Miami has talent but when payers get suspended its a bad sign that the team is not focused
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15617]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21442
Joined: 9/24/07
|
Re: Not exactly doubting you on this but sort of.
Dec 26, 2016, 11:45 AM
|
|
Not to disagree, and you may be right, but last year when we suspended Cain, we surely looked focused for both OU and AL games. That's not 6 players, but sometimes it makes those who are left concentrate much more knowing there is no margin for error. Still, I'm no MR fan, nor do I care about UM, but I can't stand WVU or their coach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [651]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 1272
Joined: 1/12/01
|
Whose we?***
Dec 26, 2016, 10:41 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58265]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39932
Joined: 11/12/04
|
the Swoffords.***
Dec 26, 2016, 11:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [48233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 30639
Joined: 11/15/99
|
Vandy may beat Nancy's Tate***
Dec 26, 2016, 10:45 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15926]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7802
Joined: 11/15/09
|
I'll take Wake and Vandy.***
Dec 26, 2016, 10:59 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6281]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12983
Joined: 4/21/15
|
Re: I'll take Wake and Vandy.***
Dec 26, 2016, 11:05 AM
|
|
No way Vandy beats NC St.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15926]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7802
Joined: 11/15/09
|
Have you seen Vandy play? They're D is legit
Dec 26, 2016, 11:22 AM
|
|
And they seem to be more consistent than NC St. You may not think Vandy wins, but to say no way it happens is just wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5287]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6929
Joined: 11/5/12
|
Re: Have you seen Vandy play? They're D is legit
Dec 26, 2016, 8:11 PM
|
|
They must not have read your post. ^_^
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22058]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13634
Joined: 11/8/13
|
here's my guesses...
Dec 26, 2016, 11:38 AM
|
|
VT win
BC loss
NCST finds a way to lose
Pitt win
Miami loss
Wake loss
Lou loss although I'm torn about changing that pick
FSU win
GT loss
Clemson win
Winning more than 5 would be a good bowl season for the ACC. A lot of these matchups aren't great for ACC schools. But as long as Clemson wins... ehhh... could care less bout those other academic institutions and Lewisville.
~JKB
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7191]
TigerPulse: 70%
Posts: 20374
Joined: 8/18/06
|
Re: ACC Bowl game predictions
Dec 26, 2016, 11:40 AM
|
|
I'm only interested in one!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 22
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
