Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Video of CIA agent admitting CIAs sedition of Trump Admin.
General Boards - Politics
add New Topic
Topics: Previous | Next
Replies: 17
| visibility 401

Video of CIA agent admitting CIAs sedition of Trump Admin.

1
3

May 5, 2024, 7:36 PM
Reply

May 5th. Timcast IRL (podcast, ~ 14.5 minutes)

“Official ADMITS CIA SUBVERTED Trump Presidency, James O’Keefe Releases BOMBSHELL Report”

Timcast podcast revealing (now fired) CIA agent (or asset) who exposed the CIA’s subversive activities regarding the Trump admin.

Notice the irony: The CIA guy said that Mike Pompeo and Gina Haspell kept details from Trump during CIA briefings because, in their alleged opinion, Trump was not trustworthy.

(*). Yet, the ‘vetted and trustworthy’ CIA agent blabs to a random chick in order to show off.

This is unconstitutional, seditious behavior by the CIA. These CIA bums, who were complicit in the Trump / Russia hoax, are the epitome of untrustworthy.

Nevertheless, to this very day America is teeming with readily brainwashed citizens who, because of their disdain for Trump’s personality, swallow any garbage from any government source of government propaganda outlet that reinforces their decision to judge Trump the President as being bad because they don’t like Trump the Person.

Sad.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbTcZc5-8Iw

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I underestimated the number of crazy mofos in this country before Trump

2

May 5, 2024, 8:14 PM
Reply

brought them out of the woodwork.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I underestimated the number of crazy mofos in this country before Trump

1

May 5, 2024, 8:29 PM
Reply

Pull your head out of the sand.

America is run by an authoritarian government.

Only fools still believe that individuals such as GWB, Clinton(s), Obama(s), Trump, or Biden were / are at risk of becoming a dictator.

Dictator is singular.

Authoritarian can be either singular or plural.

Don’t tell me that you believe that Biden is running the WH. The bureaucracy didn’t let Trump run the government, either.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


It's amazing how many of y'all have never met people before.

3

May 6, 2024, 12:34 AM
Reply

Do you not have a single friend or family member that is a federal employee/military? Cause if you did, you'd have a good understanding of how laughable some of this is. The same people who love to point out government inefficiency think there are agency wide plots against the POTUS. This dude is a CONTRACTOR whose job title is project manager. Do you think there were agency wide memos regarding keeping Trump in the dark or is much more likely that he's talking out his ### to impress a bumble date?

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There's a well used governmental term... 'Compartmentalized'. "Eyes only".***

1

May 6, 2024, 8:56 AM
Reply



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: It's amazing how many of y'all have never met people before.

1

May 6, 2024, 11:01 AM [ in reply to It's amazing how many of y'all have never met people before. ]
Reply

Duh … there are many non-executive level employees who work for corrupt employers or seditious agencies who have no idea about the intent of the high level managers in those organizations. This is not to suggest that these unaware non-executive level employees are stupid.

Take Enron for example. This was a big outfit, yet it was a shock to everyone when the illegality of Enron’s M.O. came to light.

Silicon Valley Bank. Many lower level employees were caught unaware that SVB was walking the tightrope with their loans vs deposits vs investment profile situation.

Ergo, most employees in the various federal agencies don’t know, or don’t want to know, or choose cognitive dissonance, and thus don’t believe that the agency for which they work is engaged in bad stuff.

(*). The sentiments of most employees of an organization has little to do with whether or not that organization is dirty.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Which is it?


May 6, 2024, 11:21 AM
Reply

cause it reads like you think the sentiments of this employee of an organization has a lot to do with whether or not the organization is dirty.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Exposed them... "51 current and former intel officials" says it all.***

1

May 6, 2024, 8:59 AM [ in reply to I underestimated the number of crazy mofos in this country before Trump ]
Reply



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Just your typical treasonous sh**lib, no problem here. The war party is totally

2

May 5, 2024, 9:49 PM
Reply

OK with this.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I've dealt with quite a few intel folks in numerous agencies and our

8

May 6, 2024, 7:27 AM
Reply

military over the years. In general, I find almost all of them to be extremely arrogant azzholes with many using the "I know a secret" method of covering their a.s.s to hide their incompetence or previous falsehoods when they are having trouble answering questions. Many of them are trained liars who can't stop the practice of embellishment and lying in their personal lives.

So who knows what the truth of the matter is with the CIA and Trump. I wouldn't doubt that they withheld or lied to the "boss" but I also wouldn't be surprised if what this CIA geek had to say was all BS either.

What I do believe is that we have allowed our Federal Government to become way too big with way too much ability in the Executive branch agencies to make policy and de-facto law through Government Regulation. I find the following to be quite accurate in its description of our Federal Government:

"We are rapidly coming to a point where a complete change of elected officials, including Congress and the White House, can mean little change in policy. You are governed more and more by people for whom you have never voted, for whom you never will vote, whom you have never seen, and whom you cannot recall by your vote. They are entrenched in the boards, bureaus and commissions, even at the policy level. For example, you may think that the Secretary of Labor sets the policy of his Department, but I know that much of the policy of that Department is set by Civil Service employees who have been with the Department for twenty years, and they have no intention, now or ever, of recommending to the Secretary of Labor any policy which does not fit their personal philosophy of government, and you cannot remove them or replace them by your ballot. That same situation exists in the State Department, and in fact in every bureau, board and commission. This is a form of invisible government and can lead to the most oppressive type of tyranny."

This quote is from the April 1960 "The Washington Report" by Congressman Bruce Alger. I'm sure this view of the Federal bureaucracy was met with much skepticism back then because the size and scope of the Federal Government in 1960 pales in comparison to what it is today. I find it to be a very accurate description of the bloated Federal Bureaucracy that passes way more laws and has much greater control over us than the legislative branch could ever dream...

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I've dealt with quite a few intel folks in numerous agencies and our

2

May 6, 2024, 8:00 AM
Reply


military over the years. In general, I find almost all of them to be extremely arrogant azzholes with many using the "I know a secret" method of covering their a.s.s to hide their incompetence or previous falsehoods when they are having trouble answering questions. Many of them are trained liars who can't stop the practice of embellishment and lying in their personal lives.

So who knows what the truth of the matter is with the CIA and Trump. I wouldn't doubt that they withheld or lied to the "boss" but I also wouldn't be surprised if what this CIA geek had to say was all BS either.

What I do believe is that we have allowed our Federal Government to become way too big with way too much ability in the Executive branch agencies to make policy and de-facto law through Government Regulation. I find the following to be quite accurate in its description of our Federal Government:

"We are rapidly coming to a point where a complete change of elected officials, including Congress and the White House, can mean little change in policy. You are governed more and more by people for whom you have never voted, for whom you never will vote, whom you have never seen, and whom you cannot recall by your vote. They are entrenched in the boards, bureaus and commissions, even at the policy level. For example, you may think that the Secretary of Labor sets the policy of his Department, but I know that much of the policy of that Department is set by Civil Service employees who have been with the Department for twenty years, and they have no intention, now or ever, of recommending to the Secretary of Labor any policy which does not fit their personal philosophy of government, and you cannot remove them or replace them by your ballot. That same situation exists in the State Department, and in fact in every bureau, board and commission. This is a form of invisible government and can lead to the most oppressive type of tyranny."

This quote is from the April 1960 "The Washington Report" by Congressman Bruce Alger. I'm sure this view of the Federal bureaucracy was met with much skepticism back then because the size and scope of the Federal Government in 1960 pales in comparison to what it is today. I find it to be a very accurate description of the bloated Federal Bureaucracy that passes way more laws and has much greater control over us than the legislative branch could ever dream...


Very well said!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

This is painfully true.

1

May 6, 2024, 1:04 PM [ in reply to I've dealt with quite a few intel folks in numerous agencies and our ]
Reply

The unelected bureaucrats in all of the over bloated fed agencies, set all the rules with regulations that don't go through any checks and balances are who really run things.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

GO TIGERS!!


Re: Video of CIA agent admitting CIAs sedition of Trump Admin.

1

May 6, 2024, 1:15 PM
Reply

It's good to see James O'Keefe still fighting the good fight even after Project Veritas punted him (even though he founded it) because of embezzlement. Supposedly he was spending donated funds on personal luxuries like charter flights and concert tickets, which imperiled Veritas's ability to claim tax-exempt status and would have been The End for that particular public service and bastion of journalistic integrity that never, ever re-edited Gotcha films to make it look like people said stuff they didn't.

Keep up the good work, James!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Nothing about the message... All about the messenger... SOP.***


May 6, 2024, 1:18 PM
Reply



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Nothing about the message... All about the messenger... SOP.***


May 6, 2024, 2:06 PM
Reply

There's certain sources I'll never, ever bother to read simply because they have zero credibility to me or anybody else who bothers to verify their sources.

Tom keeps presenting us with dog turds and insisting there's genuine diamonds inside them. Even allowing that there's a one-in-a-thousand chance he's right (which I doubt), I have zero interest in rooting through a thousand dog turds to find that one nugget of actual information inside. Life's too short and sociopathic professional for-hire character assassinators like James O'Keefe certainly do not warrant the effort. Plus, well, you have to handle a lot of dog turds. Which is gross. It says a lot about folks who don't seem to mind.

Your favorite on-line rag ZeroHedge also qualifies as Genuine Certified Dogmuffin as well, by the way. I just don't care to waste my time reading, well, anything that's fronted by the bankers of Russian oligarchs from Sofia, Bulgaria, and is known to collaborate directly with the Russian FSB.

If that strikes you as elitist or somehow unfair...well, I genuinely don't care. But folks are wasting their time on anybody except maybe addled octogenerians like lightbulbbill trying to convince anybody with that kind of lunatic fringe crap.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Okay, so the video was AI generated or just some fake skit...? That's the ticket***


May 6, 2024, 4:10 PM
Reply

As to Zerohedge, most articles reference the source. Distinguishing 'propaganda' is an intrinsically biased proposition.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


This post reminds me of this one from 3 months ago.


May 6, 2024, 1:28 PM
Reply

These amazing breaking news stories never seem to go anywhere.

https://www.tigernet.com/clemson-forum/message/donald-trumps-26-associates-illegally-targeted-by-cia-34445782

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


What? You expect them to investigate themselves? Of course, that seems plausible


May 6, 2024, 1:54 PM
Reply

for most bureaucratically enthused sheeple... Again, "51 current and former intel officials" had no problem openly lying to influence an election. Think about all the BS they're hiding.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 17
| visibility 401
General Boards - Politics
add New Topic
Topics: Previous | Next